For a limited-time only, the Kindle e-book of The Color of Compromise is on sale for just $2.99. You can see for yourself what all the fuss is about. I-a known racial discontent and obvious Marxist/Communist/Woke™ provocateur-wrote it, so it must be wrong. Perhaps it is simply guilt by association. What is so offensive about those statements escapes me.
And there can be no confession without truth. There can be no repentance without confession. History and scripture teach us that there can be no reconciliation without repentance. Indifference to oppression perpetuates oppression. The refusal to act in the midst of injustice is itself an injustice. Here is the offending quote from the first chapter of The Color of Compromise. RT JemarTisby: 'When Professor Moore pressed the provost for evidence that what she was teaching was wrong, he saidJemar Tisby is the main focus. Tisby argues that the Religious Right converted its racism into innocent-sounding code language, like 'law and order,' 'accountability,' and 'individualism. She didn’t even assign my book as one of their readings. Nowadays, all the American church needs to do in terms of compromise is cooperate with already established and racially unequal systems' (160). Professor had used a single quote of mine in the narrative portion of her syllabus that helps frame the course.
When Professor Moore pressed the provost for evidence that what she was teaching was wrong, he said… Her contract at the school was not renewed because the provost accused her of using her composition class on the theme of racial justice to indoctrinate students with leftist ideas. Recently Professor Julie Moore of Taylor University reached out to me about her story.
0 kommentar(er)
